Fencing Draft notes:Rules For Fencers: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→2.6.2) |
|||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
:April 2023 - Clarified that the different fencing types may not be used in the same bout - eg one opponent may not use Cut and Thrust rules while the other uses Standard Fencing rules. | :April 2023 - Clarified that the different fencing types may not be used in the same bout - eg one opponent may not use Cut and Thrust rules while the other uses Standard Fencing rules. | ||
===2.6.2=== | ===2.6.2=== | ||
*What was 2.6.2.1 Killing from behind has been renumbered to 2.6.3 to avoid a numbering | *What was 2.6.2.1 Killing from behind has been renumbered to 2.6.3 to avoid a numbering clash with 2.6.2 Striking your opponent's sub rules. | ||
*What was 2.6.2.2 Killing a gunner has been renumbered to 2.6.4 to avoid a numbering | *What was 2.6.2.2 Killing a gunner has been renumbered to 2.6.4 to avoid a numbering clash with 2.6.2 Striking your opponent's sub rules. | ||
*Subsequent rules have been renumbered. | *Subsequent rules have been renumbered. | ||
===2.6.2.4=== | ===2.6.2.4=== | ||
;Was | ;Was |
Revision as of 01:27, 28 March 2023
Notes from Earl Marshal for next update
- Somewhere in 2.1?
- Authorisation and participation for minors - link to minor participation/authorisation forms - include information about getting approval from parent/guardians
- Rejig into multiple pages
-
- When you are allowed to fence, Fighting by the rules, and Issues on the field
- Types of fencing, Single combat and melee
- Using your weapons and defensive objects, taking blows
- Wearing protective equipment
Changes for v 6.0
2.1.2
- Was
- To be authorised, you have to pass a verbal and practical test to show that you...
- Now
- To be authorised, you have to pass a verbal and practical combat test to show that you...
- Functional change
- Addition of the word "combat" to highlight that the practical component must include combat
- Reason
- The handbook currently has two phrases meaning the same component of the authorising process. This combines them.
- For notes section
- April 2023 - The practical component of authorisations must include combat.
2.4.1.2
- Was
- Not in rules previously
- Now
- Different types of fencing combat cannot face each other in the same bout. For example, Cut and Thrust may not face Standard fencing.
- Subsequent rules renumbered
- Functional change
- Prevents opponents from using different rules in the same bout.
- Reason
- Bouts must operate under a single ruleset; this change prevents a clash. Was not clear previously.
- For notes section
- April 2023 - Clarified that the different fencing types may not be used in the same bout - eg one opponent may not use Cut and Thrust rules while the other uses Standard Fencing rules.
2.6.2
- What was 2.6.2.1 Killing from behind has been renumbered to 2.6.3 to avoid a numbering clash with 2.6.2 Striking your opponent's sub rules.
- What was 2.6.2.2 Killing a gunner has been renumbered to 2.6.4 to avoid a numbering clash with 2.6.2 Striking your opponent's sub rules.
- Subsequent rules have been renumbered.
2.6.2.4
- Was
- You and your opponent need to agree to allow the use of tip cuts before the bout
- Now
- Removed
- Subsequent rules renumbered
- Functional change
- Opponents no longer need to agree to the use of tip cuts beforre they can be used.
- Reason
- Tip cuts are an accepted part of fencing combat in Lochac.
- For notes section
- April 2023 - Tip cuts are an accepted part of fencing combat in Lochac, so the previous requirement to agree to use them has been removed.
Was 2.6.2.1, now 2.6.3
- Was
- Not in rules
- Now
- 2.6.3.3 - You must use "killing from behind" when you are behind the line of your opponent's shoulders. Marshals may further restrict this angle at their discretion.
- 2.6.3.4 - If “killing from behind” is not allowed in the scenario, you may not strike your opponent while behind the line of your opponent’s shoulders.
- Functional change
- Clarification added for when killing from behind may be used, and allows marshals to add additional restrictions
- Reason
- Adds clarity around when killing from behind can be used. Marshals will be able to add additional restrictions (such as "outside of 120 degrees of the front arc"), but this is very difficult to clearly legislate.
- For notes section
- April 2023 - Clarification added for when killing from behind may be used, and allows marshals to add additional restrictions