Fencing Draft notes:Supervising Combat: Difference between revisions

From SCA Lochac
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
===Changes in Supervising Combat===
==Notes of things to fix==
;Was 1.3.2 in Introduction, now 11.1.1 in Supervising Combat - General
==Change log==
;Rule number
:
:
;Was
;Was
:A rostered fencing marshal must be appointed as Marshal-in-Charge to supervise fencing combat at events or practices.
:What the text used to say
;Now
;Now
:If fencing is going to happen at an event or practice, there must be Fencing Marshal-in-Charge of that event or practice. They must be an authorised Fencing Marshal.
:What the proposed new text says
;Functional change
;Functional change
:None
:What does this change actually do in terms of things we can now, or cannot now do?
;Reason
;Reason
:Moved to relevant section of rules. Updated as we don't refer to rostered marshals in these rules.
:Why are you making this change?
<hr>
 
;Was 1.3.3 in Introduction, now 11.1.2 in Supervising Combat - General
:Each bout must be supervised by a rostered fencing marshal or an authorised fencing combatant.
;Now
:Any time fencers are fencing, an authorised Fencing Marshal must have taken responsibility for that fencing. That responsible marshal must either directly supervise the fencing themselves or delegate that supervision to another willing Fencing Marshal or authorised fencing combatant.
;Functional change
:None
;Reason
:Reminds people that even pick-ups need an authorised marshal to be responsible for what is happening, but they can delegate supervision to another while they are fighting.
;For notes
;For notes
:June 2023 - A reminder that even pick-ups need an authorised marshal to be responsible for the fighting, but they can delegate supervision to another while they are taking part in combat.
:Heading - date of change. What are you going to record about this change in the Notes for the page to explain to readers what happened to the rules. Particularly note if we are being more restrictive than Society rules, or have a variance from Society rules.
<hr>
;Was 3.3.2, now 11.2.2 in Supervising single combat
:
;Addition of
:If you are not legally fit to drive, you are not fit to marshal!
;Functional change
:None
;Reason
:Reminder of the importance of sound judgement for marshals
<hr>
 
;Was 3.3.4, now 11.2.4
:
;Was
:At the start of the bout, you should allow the Herald to introduce the combatants (or make the introductions yourself) and show proper respect to the Crown. You should check the field for any hazards (such as holes or loose ground), ask the combatants if they are ready and then call for the bout to begin (such as "lay on", "allez", etc.).
;Now
:At the start of the bout, you must check the field for any hazards (such as holes or loose ground), ask the combatants if they are ready and then call for the bout to begin (such as "lay on", "allez", "begin", etc.).
;Functional change
:Heraldic activity not required
;Reason
:Not a safety regulation and does not take into account supervising single combat outside of formal tournaments. Added plain language option for starting bouts.
<hr>
 
;Was 3.4.6, would have been 11.3.6 in Supervising melee combat
:
;Was
:Cut and Thrust combat is allowed in a melee, as long as all fencers are properly armoured.
;Now
:Removed, covered elsewhere, and subsequent rules renumbered
<hr>

Latest revision as of 10:02, 23 December 2023

Notes of things to fix

Change log

Rule number
Was
What the text used to say
Now
What the proposed new text says
Functional change
What does this change actually do in terms of things we can now, or cannot now do?
Reason
Why are you making this change?
For notes
Heading - date of change. What are you going to record about this change in the Notes for the page to explain to readers what happened to the rules. Particularly note if we are being more restrictive than Society rules, or have a variance from Society rules.