Fencing Draft notes:Rules For Managing Incidents: Difference between revisions

From SCA Lochac
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Changes for v6.0==
==Notes of things to fix==
;Chapter 4 - Rules for managing incidents is now Chapter 13
==Change log==
;Rule number
:
:
<hr>
;Was 4.1 General
:Removed
;Reason
:Chapter intro added. Only one useful rule in this section, and it has been moved to the next section as 13.1.1, and subsequent rules renumbered.
<hr>
;13.2.2
:
;Insert new rule
:Fencers should discourage their opponent from taking a blow the fencer feels was excessive.
:Subsequent rule renumbered.
;Functional change
:None
;Reason
:There is constant discussion as to if an excessive blow is illegal. I do not believe that it strictly is, but this rule encourages both safety and sportsmanship.
;For notes
:June 2023 - If you think you accidentally hit your opponent too hard, tell your opponent not to take it.
<hr>
;Was 4.4 Injuries, now 13.3 Injuries, and 13.4 Reporting
:Substantively rewritten to include similar rules from armoured combat for dealing with injuries, information about returning to the field, with particular attention to concussion
:Section added on reporting of injuries and near-misses.
;For notes
:June 2023 - Please note the new rules with regards to concussion, where the injured person must leave the field and cannot participate in combat or training until assessed medically, '''even if symptoms resolve'''. New rules in 13.3 and 13.4 have been added about managing injuries and other incidents, and reporting requirements.
<hr>
;Was, now 13.4 in Weapons failure
;Was 4.6 and 4.7, now 13.5 Other action
:This section has been substantively rewritten.
===4.7.2.5===
;Was
;Was
:The test might be:
:What the text used to say
:*a verbal test to confirm that the person understands the rule in question
:*a combat test, where the fencer fights under the supervision of the impartial marshal to confirm that the issue has been resolved.
;Now
;Now
:The test might be:
:What the proposed new text says
:*a verbal test to confirm that the person understands the rule in question
:*a practical combat test, where the fencer fights under the supervision of the impartial marshal to confirm that the issue has been resolved.
;Functional change
;Functional change
:None - applying consistent terminology
:What does this change actually do in terms of things we can now, or cannot now do?
;Reason
;Reason
:The handbook currently has two phrases meaning the same component of the authorising process. This combines them.
:Why are you making this change?
;For notes section
;For notes
:No notes required.
:Heading - date of change. What are you going to record about this change in the Notes for the page to explain to readers what happened to the rules. Particularly note if we are being more restrictive than Society rules, or have a variance from Society rules.

Latest revision as of 10:03, 23 December 2023

Notes of things to fix

Change log

Rule number
Was
What the text used to say
Now
What the proposed new text says
Functional change
What does this change actually do in terms of things we can now, or cannot now do?
Reason
Why are you making this change?
For notes
Heading - date of change. What are you going to record about this change in the Notes for the page to explain to readers what happened to the rules. Particularly note if we are being more restrictive than Society rules, or have a variance from Society rules.
Retrieved from ‘https://sca.org.nz/wiki/index.php?title=Fencing_Draft_notes:Rules_For_Managing_Incidents&oldid=7096’