Fencing Draft notes:Rules For Managing Incidents: Difference between revisions

From SCA Lochac
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Notes from Earl Marshal for next update==
==Notes of things to fix==
Include concussion protocols from Armoured combat rules [[Armoured_Combat:Combat_Injury_Procedures|6.3.1]].  If the injury involves a suspected concussion, the patient must leave the field and cannot participate in combat until they have been cleared of potential concussion. The patient should be assessed against Concussion in Sport Group's [https://resources.fifa.com/image/upload/concussion-recognition-tool-5.pdf?cloudid=y9y5fpwji70rtzyefdoa Concussion Recognition Tool 5], and referred to a healthcare professional as appropriate.
==Change log==
 
;Rule number
==Changes for v6.0==
:
===4.7.2.5===
;Was
;Was
:The test might be:
:What the text used to say
:*a verbal test to confirm that the person understands the rule in question
:*a combat test, where the fencer fights under the supervision of the impartial marshal to confirm that the issue has been resolved.
;Now
;Now
:The test might be:
:What the proposed new text says
:*a verbal test to confirm that the person understands the rule in question
:*a practical combat test, where the fencer fights under the supervision of the impartial marshal to confirm that the issue has been resolved.
;Functional change
;Functional change
:None - applying consistent terminology
:What does this change actually do in terms of things we can now, or cannot now do?
;Reason
;Reason
:The handbook currently has two phrases meaning the same component of the authorising process. This combines them.
:Why are you making this change?
;For notes section
;For notes
:No notes required.
:Heading - date of change. What are you going to record about this change in the Notes for the page to explain to readers what happened to the rules. Particularly note if we are being more restrictive than Society rules, or have a variance from Society rules.

Latest revision as of 10:03, 23 December 2023

Notes of things to fix

Change log

Rule number
Was
What the text used to say
Now
What the proposed new text says
Functional change
What does this change actually do in terms of things we can now, or cannot now do?
Reason
Why are you making this change?
For notes
Heading - date of change. What are you going to record about this change in the Notes for the page to explain to readers what happened to the rules. Particularly note if we are being more restrictive than Society rules, or have a variance from Society rules.
Retrieved from ‘https://sca.org.nz/wiki/index.php?title=Fencing_Draft_notes:Rules_For_Managing_Incidents&oldid=7096’