Fencing Draft notes:Authorisation Procedures: Difference between revisions

From SCA Lochac
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
;For next review
==Notes of things to fix==
:Include note that authorisation bouts must occur at events or official practices as that's where SCA combat occurs. We have no jursidiction over people poking each other in their back yards, so it's not our business, and authorisations need to be our business.
==Change log==
 
;Rule number
==Changes for v6.0==
:
===8.1.2 in Authorisation procedures - General===
;Was
;Was
:To be authorised, participants must pass a verbal and practical test to show that they...
:What the text used to say
;Now
;Now
:To be authorised, participants must pass a verbal and practical combat test to show that they...
:What the proposed new text says
;Functional change
;Functional change
:Addition of the word "combat" to highlight that the practical component must include combat
:What does this change actually do in terms of things we can now, or cannot now do?
;Reason
;Reason
:The handbook currently has two phrases meaning the same component of the authorising process. This combines them.
:Why are you making this change?
;For notes section
;For notes
April 2023 - The practical component of authorisations must include combat.
:Heading - date of change. What are you going to record about this change in the Notes for the page to explain to readers what happened to the rules. Particularly note if we are being more restrictive than Society rules, or have a variance from Society rules.
 
===8.1.4===
;Was
:Not in rules
;Now
:The practical combat test includes fencing against another fencer, and is observed and directed by the Authorising Fencing Marshal. In rare circumstances, where there is no other way for the fencer to undertake an authorisation, the Kingdom Fencing Marshal may act as the authorising marshal remotely, observing and directing the combat over a live video.
;Functional change
:Allows for obeservation and direction of a combat authorisation by the Kingdom Fencing Marshal remotely over video as a last resort.
;Reason
:There may be rare circumstances where an Authorising Fencing marshal is not physically able to be present. This allows for obeservation and direction of a combat authorisation by the Kingdom Fencing Marshal remotely over video as a last resort.
;For notes section
:April 2023 - Provision added for the Kingdom Fencing Marshal to obesrve and direct a combat authorisation as the Authorising Fencing Marshal via live video when no other options are available.
===8.1.5===
;Was
:Not in rules
;Now
:This test must occur within one month of the verbal test, and must be a dedicated practical combat test - it is not sufficient to simply have seen the fencer fight during a tournament, for example.
;Functional change
:Adds a timeframe for when a combat test can occur relative to the theory component, and ensures that the bouts must be part of an authorisation process.
;Reason
:There was no guidance previously.

Latest revision as of 10:03, 23 December 2023

Notes of things to fix

Change log

Rule number
Was
What the text used to say
Now
What the proposed new text says
Functional change
What does this change actually do in terms of things we can now, or cannot now do?
Reason
Why are you making this change?
For notes
Heading - date of change. What are you going to record about this change in the Notes for the page to explain to readers what happened to the rules. Particularly note if we are being more restrictive than Society rules, or have a variance from Society rules.
Retrieved from ‘https://sca.org.nz/wiki/index.php?title=Fencing_Draft_notes:Authorisation_Procedures&oldid=7097’