Fencing Draft notes:Types Of Fencing: Difference between revisions

From SCA Lochac
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
===2.4.1.1 in Types of fencing - General===
==Notes of things to fix==
==Change log==
;Rule number
:
;Was
;Was
:*Standard fencing
:What the text used to say
:*Cut and Thrust fencing
;Now
;Now
:*Standard fencing (sometimes called "rapier")
:What the proposed new text says
:*Cut and Thrust fencing, which allows percussive cuts and requires additional armour.
;Functional change
;Functional change
:None
:What does this change actually do in terms of things we can now, or cannot now do?
;Reason
;Reason
:Clarification following a query, and explains what the difference is for Cut & Thrust
:Why are you making this change?
;For notes section
;For notes
:Not required
:Heading - date of change. What are you going to record about this change in the Notes for the page to explain to readers what happened to the rules. Particularly note if we are being more restrcitive than Society rules, or have a variance from Society rules.
 
===2.4.1.2 in Types of fencing - General===
;Was
:Not in rules previously
;Now
:Different types of fencing combat cannot face each other in the same bout. For example, Cut and Thrust may not face Standard fencing.
:Subsequent rules renumbered
;Functional change
:Prevents opponents from using different rules in the same bout.
;Reason
:Bouts must operate under a single ruleset; this change prevents a clash. Was not clear previously.
;For notes section
:June 2023 - Clarified that the different fencing types may not be used in the same bout - eg one opponent may not use Cut and Thrust rules while the other uses Standard Fencing rules.
 
===2.4.2.2 in Types of fencing - Prerequisites===
;Was
:There is no waiting period for obtaining these additional authorisations.
;Now
:There is no waiting period for obtaining these additional authorisations. This means you may be authorised in Spear or Cut and Thrust immediately after your Standard fencing authorisation.
;Functional change
:None, clarification
;Reason
:Clarification following query from participant.
;For notes section
:June 2023 - Clarification that you can complete multiple authorisations at one practice or event in order to meet prerequisite requirements.
 
===2.4.2.3 in Types of fencing - Prerequisites===
;Was
:You can use a spear if you have a current Rapier Pike or Pole Weapon authorisation under the previous Lochac Rapier Rules.
;Now
:You can use a spear if you have a current Rapier Pike or Pole Weapon authorisation under prior Lochac Rapier Rules.
;Functional change
:None. Grammar change only
;Reason
:Rapier Pike and Pole Weapon appear in earlier rule sets, but not v5 which these rules supersede.
;For notes section
:Not required.

Latest revision as of 09:59, 23 December 2023

Notes of things to fix

Change log

Rule number
Was
What the text used to say
Now
What the proposed new text says
Functional change
What does this change actually do in terms of things we can now, or cannot now do?
Reason
Why are you making this change?
For notes
Heading - date of change. What are you going to record about this change in the Notes for the page to explain to readers what happened to the rules. Particularly note if we are being more restrcitive than Society rules, or have a variance from Society rules.
Retrieved from ‘https://sca.org.nz/wiki/index.php?title=Fencing_Draft_notes:Types_Of_Fencing&oldid=7084’