Fencing notes:Types Of Fencing: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
;Reason | ;Reason | ||
:The handbook currently has two phrases meaning the same component of the authorising process. This combines them. | :The handbook currently has two phrases meaning the same component of the authorising process. This combines them. | ||
===2.4.1.2=== | |||
;Was | |||
:Not in rules previously | |||
;Now | |||
:Different types of fencing combat cannot face each other in the same bout. For example, Cut and Thrust may not face Standard fencing. | |||
:Subsequent rules renumbered | |||
;Functional change | |||
:Prevents opponents from using different rules in the same bout. | |||
;Reason | |||
:Bouts must operate under a single ruleset; this change prevents a clash. Was not clear previously. |
Revision as of 00:41, 28 March 2023
Changes for v 6.0
2.1.2
- Was
- To be authorised, you have to pass a verbal and practical test to show that you...
- Now
- To be authorised, you have to pass a verbal and practical combat test to show that you...
- Functional change
- Addition of the word "combat" to highlight that the practical component must include combat
- Reason
- The handbook currently has two phrases meaning the same component of the authorising process. This combines them.
2.4.1.2
- Was
- Not in rules previously
- Now
- Different types of fencing combat cannot face each other in the same bout. For example, Cut and Thrust may not face Standard fencing.
- Subsequent rules renumbered
- Functional change
- Prevents opponents from using different rules in the same bout.
- Reason
- Bouts must operate under a single ruleset; this change prevents a clash. Was not clear previously.