Armoured Combat Draft notes:Armour Requirements
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Update for v3.3.1
- 7.8.1 - Groin
- Was
- The groin must be protected to a standard equivalent to that provided by an athletic cup or pubic protector, secured by straps, or worn in a supporter or fighting garment designed to hold the protection in place.
- Now
- Testicles must be protected to a standard equivalent to that provided by an athletic cup, secured by straps, or worn in a supporter or fighting garment designed to hold the protection in place.
- Functional change
- Removes the requirement for groin protection for anyone who does not have testicles (regardless of gender)
- Reason
- Research by medical personnel has not found data to support the need for rigid groin protection for women, even for high contact sports or similar activities.
- For notes
- November 2023 - The requirement for people without testicles to wear groin protection was removed from Society armoured combat rules in October 2023. Research by medical personnel has not found data to support the need for rigid groin protection for those without testicles, even for high contact sports or similar activities. The wording reflects input from the DEIA community to accommodate variations. The potential for permanent life-changing injury due to testicular trauma is why groin protection is required.
- 7.9.3 - Body
- Was
- If breast protection is worn, separate floating breast cups are prohibited unless they are connected by an interconnecting rigid piece such as a heavy leather or metal breastplate.
- Now
- Removed
- Functional change
- Separate breast cups for chest protection are no longer prohibited
- Reason
- Not needed for safety issues. Originally intended to dissuade "fantasy" armor styles. Removes ambiguity raised for other acceptable armour styles such as lamellar, scale, small plate armor.
- For notes section
- November 2023 - The prohibition on separate breast cups for chest protection was removed from Society armoured combat rules in October 2023. The rule was not needed for safety issues, and was originally intended to dissuade "fantasy" armour styles. The rule also created some ambiguity around other acceptable armour styles such as lamellar, scale, or small plate armour.