Fencing Draft notes:Protective Equipment

From SCA Lochac
Revision as of 02:03, 19 June 2023 by Angele (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Was 2.8 Wearing protective equipment, now 8 Protective equipment
Intro has been incorporated into 8.1 General requirements
Was
This section describes the protective clothing and other equipment that you must wear for combat. Your equipment must be designed and worn so that there are no gaps over vital body areas, and no more than incidental gaps over other parts of your body. These are the minimum standards for fencing clothing and equipment. You can wear additional equipment, including appropriate period clothing like hoop skirts or gauntlets with stiffened cuffs, but you need to make sure that you are still able to feel and call "good" blows.
Now
This section describes the protective clothing and other equipment that you must wear for combat.
8.1 General requirements
1. Your armour is to be designed and worn so that no gaps form over vital body areas when you assumes any reasonable position, and no more than incidental gaps on other areas.
a. If there is a small gap in coverage for areas required to be covered by abrasion-resistant material, such as a loose seam on a glove, then the item is still considered safe and legal.
b. A "Hold!" should not be called for incidental gapping in abrasion resistant armour, such as a gap between glove and sleeve, or a sock slipping down during a lunge.
2. These are the minimum standards for fencing clothing and equipment. You can wear additional equipment, including appropriate period clothing like hoop skirts, or additional protective equipment such as a chest protector for comfort, but you need to make sure that you are still able to feel and call "good" blows.
Functional change
None
Reason
Explanatory language, and clearer example, making clear that comfort based safety equipment is legal

Was 2.8.1.1 in General requirements, now 8.2.1 in Drills
Was
Fencing practice sessions can also include drills and other classes that do not involve fighting. During sword or dagger drills with an opponent, you must wear eye protection, such as spectacles, sunglasses, safety glasses or a fencing mask or helm.
Now
During sword or dagger drills with an opponent, you must wear eye protection, such as a fencing mask, helm or safety glasses. Spectacles and sunglasses are not considered eye protection. Eye protection which is not a fencing mask or helm must be rated to at least AS/NZS 1337, and the lens component must be part of the body of the protection (i.e., no separate lenses which can pop out).
Functional change
Spectacles and sunglasses are not considered eye protection. Eye protection must meet AS/NZS standards.
Reason
There is significant literature noting that spectacles, sunglasses and other equivalent eyewear do not provide protection to the wearer. If there is a concern of eye injury, then this provides appropriate protective standards.
For notes
June 2023 - Eye protection which is not a fencing mask or helm must be rated to at least AS/NZS 1337, and the lens component must be integral to the body of the protection (i.e., no separate lenses which can pop out).
Was 2.8.1 in General requirements, now 8.2.2 in Drills
Was
You must wear full face protection for weapons drills using a spear.
Now
You must wear full face protection for weapons drills against an opponent using a spear.
Functional change
You must wear full face protection if you are drilling against an opponent who has a spear, rather than if you are using one yourself
Reason
Facing the spear is the risky part, not using it.
For notes section
June 2023 - You must wear full face protection when your opponent has a spear during drills.

Was 2.8.1.3, now 8.3
Moved what was section 5.1 in Rules for equipment to be 8.3 in Protective equipment
Reason
Better loaction for it with the other protective equipment information.

Was a bullet point of 5.1.2 in Rules for equipment, now 8.3.2 in Protective equipment
Removed "225g" from "One layer of hardened heavy leather (8oz; 3.2mm)."
Reason
8oz is a measure of leather thickness, not an actual weight that needed translation into metric.

Was 2.8.2.2.a, now 8.4.2.a in Head
Was
Modern fencing masks meet this requirement, but you might need additional padding if the mask's padding degrades as it gets older.
Now
Modern fencing masks meet this requirement, but you might need additional padding if the mask's padding degrades as it gets older. Whether your padding is suitable will be checked by a Marshal during inspections.
Functional change
None
Reason
Clarifies if and when this will be checked and is reiterated in the inspection procedures.

Was 2.8.2.4.a and b, now 8.4.4 in Head
Was
a. For combat involving rubber band guns, we recommend you use resilient padding or rigid material to protect the back of your head.
b. You must wear rigid material to protect the back your head in Cut and Thrust fencing.
Now
a)removed and b now 8.4.5
Functional change
None, a. was a recommendation
Reason
a. Unnecessary and not in line with risk or Society standards. Note that this is not currently a requirement.

Was 2.8.3.1-2, now 8.5.1-2
Was
1. You must wear a gorget (collar) made from rigid material to protect your entire neck and throat. This should be backed by resilient padding or penetration-resistant material.
2. You must also protect your cervical vertebrae with rigid material. This might be a combination of a gorget, helm or hood insert.
Now
You must wear a gorget (collar) made from rigid material to protect your entire neck and throat. This should be backed by resilient padding or penetration-resistant material. Figure 2 shows the area which must be protected.
2.8.2 has been removed and replaced by:
Neck protection with a gap of less than 9mm (for example, where the ends of two plates meet) meets this standard, so long as the gap is not within the front or rear 90 degree arc.
Functional change
Clarifies areas that must be covered by rigid material, and what sized gaps may be allowed.
Reason
Updates rules to remain practical and more in line with Society requirements, without reducing safety from existing practice.
The deleted section of this rule has not been enforced since a variation was introduced at least prior to 2008, as the understanding of "cervical verterbrae" differs from what is strictly written. As currently written, gorgets must protect the entire cervical column to the base of the skull, which no known gorgets do so (though gorget combined with rigid back of head protection often does so). This revised rule is equivalent to what fencers in Lochac are currently doing already, and what is accepted international practice. This issue has been raised with SRM on two occasions with no response; I expect because it would require a rapid change, such as what we are proposing here. There is no loss in safety by having a small gap, and Lochac rules are already stricter than Society level rules. Fencing blunts will not be able to penetrate this gap; this clarifies expectations around incidental gaps.
For notes section
June 2023 - Image added to clarify what parts of the neck must be protected by rigid material, and what sized gaps may be allowed.

Was 2.8.4.2, now 8.6.2 in Torso
Was
Breast protection, such as a plastron or extra padding, is strongly recommended.
Now
Breast protection, such as a plastron or extra padding, is encouraged, but not required.
Functional change
None
Reason
Clarifying and explicitly stating that it's not required.

8.7.3 in Legs, feet and arms
Insert new rule
3. Everyone on the field, including combatants and non-combatants such as marshals, must wear enclosed footwear.
1. Period-style footwear is strongly encouraged.
2. Footwear with soles that provide good traction is strongly recommended.
Functional change
Everyone on the field must wear enclosed footwear. This is an increased requirement to Society rules, which allow you to fight in hose, presuming that the fabric meets the definition of abrasion-resistant.
Reason
Matches requirement for footwear in armoured combat rules.
For notes section
June 2023 - Enclosed footwear is required.

Flagging due to query about what is the actual protection requirement for feet beyond protection against abrasions.